Oh, I don't know where to start with this, really, but I guess a good place is to simply post what this lady had to say:
Is everyone supposed to accept gay marriage now that a Ravens' linebacker and a few other players have put their stamp of approval on it ("Tackling homophobia," Oct. 8)? From the size of the article and the photo of Brendon Ayanbadejo, you would think so, but this is just one man's opinion.
The majority of people still think that marriage should be between a man and a woman. After all, that's the way it's been since the beginning of the human race. The special relationship between the sexes was and always will be essential to the survival of the human race. No amount of approval from athletes can change that.
Let gays and lesbians do their thing, but don't call it marriage. Can't they be creative and come up with a different name? Don't degrade marriage it by linking it to a lifestyle that most theologians and the Bible call immoral.
Mary F. Kollner, Baltimore
Here is a better question, in response to her first question: Is everybody supposed to disagree with gay marriage just because a 2000-year-old book says they should? From this woman's response, you would think so, but this is just one woman's opinion.
Why should religious dogma dictate society's laws? The majority of people of this world are not Christian, and while the majority of this country might be, that doesn't mean their religious dogma should dictate the lives of everybody else in it. If those people do not wish to accept gay marriage, then they do not have to have one.
Mary seems to think that marriage has to deal with procreation and she also suggests that it's been around as long as the human race. On the contrary, anthropologists and social-theorists who understand anything about the history of the institution could tell you that before marriage existed, the human race existed, propigated and repopulated. Not until society existed and permanent settlements became norm did marriage exist. Once society became interested in "I've got mine and you've got yours", an insurance policy against raising children not of your bloodline had to be invented: marriage.
Is everyone supposed to accept gay marriage now that a Ravens' linebacker and a few other players have put their stamp of approval on it ("Tackling homophobia," Oct. 8)? From the size of the article and the photo of Brendon Ayanbadejo, you would think so, but this is just one man's opinion.
The majority of people still think that marriage should be between a man and a woman. After all, that's the way it's been since the beginning of the human race. The special relationship between the sexes was and always will be essential to the survival of the human race. No amount of approval from athletes can change that.
Let gays and lesbians do their thing, but don't call it marriage. Can't they be creative and come up with a different name? Don't degrade marriage it by linking it to a lifestyle that most theologians and the Bible call immoral.
Mary F. Kollner, Baltimore
Here is a better question, in response to her first question: Is everybody supposed to disagree with gay marriage just because a 2000-year-old book says they should? From this woman's response, you would think so, but this is just one woman's opinion.
Why should religious dogma dictate society's laws? The majority of people of this world are not Christian, and while the majority of this country might be, that doesn't mean their religious dogma should dictate the lives of everybody else in it. If those people do not wish to accept gay marriage, then they do not have to have one.
Mary seems to think that marriage has to deal with procreation and she also suggests that it's been around as long as the human race. On the contrary, anthropologists and social-theorists who understand anything about the history of the institution could tell you that before marriage existed, the human race existed, propigated and repopulated. Not until society existed and permanent settlements became norm did marriage exist. Once society became interested in "I've got mine and you've got yours", an insurance policy against raising children not of your bloodline had to be invented: marriage.
1. Source